Professional learning, Not sure about these models?

Although a rather simplistic model Dealtry, R (2004) it is easy to see how learning can be classed in this way. Of the four boxes in Table 7.1. 'A four-dimensional learning domain framework for making learning choices', by classify learning in this way it is also possible to determine the likely hood of success, it could be considered more challenging for a student that puts himself in box D rather than box A. In terms of H808 this year I would put myself in 'C' in that I am performing an unfamiliar learning task in a familiar work situation which implies a moderate risk.

Table 7.1

However in terms of Table 2 'Types of practice in continuing professional development', Clegg et al., (2002) it is not as apparent what use this serves. In the context of H808 reflection is very much a part of the course content and indeed the course assessment. I would expect to be in D for the course, reflection being directed within the course, with some slight deviation into C due to time constraints and the need to prioritise effort. In terms of my profession I should be in B it is important to reflect on teaching practice but in reality time is again a significant factor, if you consider less formal reflection then it is quite easy to comply with B what often happens is that reflection takes place and action may well follow at a later date. Again I am not quite sure of the significance of the second diagram, but I am open to enlightenment.

Table 2

References
Clegg, S., Tan, J. and Saeidi, S. (2002) ‘Reflecting or acting? Reflective practice and continuing professional development in higher education’ (online), Reflective Practice, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 131–46. Available from:
http://libezproxy.open.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14623940220129924 (accessed 19 August 2009).

Dealtry, R. (2004) ‘Professional practice: the savvy learner’ (online),Journal of Workplace Learning, vol. 16, no. 1/2, pp. 101–109. Available from: http://libezproxy.open.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13665620410521567 (accessed 9 October 2009).